HR Articles

With many employers seeing the business need to layoff employees during the past several months, it may be tempting for a manager to use it as a way to avoid confronting problem employees.  When conducting a formal layoff, however, employers would need to follow certain guidelines and be aware of specific state and federal laws.  In general, employers are often better off taking the more appropriately accountable route of employment termination for cause using progressive discipline. 
In turn, keep the following three points in mind:

  1. Eliminate the Position. A layoff involves eliminating positions and not people. Determine your business-essential positions, and your supporting documentation should demonstrate that a position to be eliminated is due to decreased work demands and / or financial reasons. If you want to get rid of a poor performing employee, then getting rid of that job position would likely be not in your best interest since the work still needs to be done.
  2. Select the Worker. For the eliminated position in question, identify all employees with similar job titles and roles. After review the type of the work that still needs to be done, figure out which of the employees are the lesser qualified.  After assessing the employees’ overall work experience, knowledge, skills, and abilities, pick the least qualified individual. If that individual happens to be the poor performing employee you initially had in mind, then you now would have a more solid basis to end the employment relationship with a layoff.
  3. Don’t Fill the Position. If an employer has a legitimate business reason to eliminate a job position, then there should be no need to bring back that position in the near future. Otherwise, the alleged layoff may be viewed as a veiled termination for cause which can cast questions on the company’s true intentions and general integrity if ever challenged.  The suggested rule of thumb is to not reopen the position for about a year.

In the bigger picture, if you are in Management, part of your direct responsibility is to effectively manage employee confrontations.  Addressing employee performance problems through corrective action holds employees accountable for their behaviors and their outcomes.  You can leverage various strategies to motivate employees to positively change their performance levels as well as to establish proof of your company’s good faith efforts to help all employees improve.

Please dont hesitate to contact the Human Resources Deaprtment and AdvanStaff any questions you may have regarding this topic.

July 1, 2009
layoffs

Lay Off Using Layoffs to Manage Poor Performing Employees

With many employers seeing the business need to layoff employees during the past several months, it may be tempting for a manager to use it as […]
June 17, 2009
law-books2

Costly Workplace Mistakes To Avoid This Year

Businesses have experienced a whirlwind of regulatory policy changes since the Obama administration took  office in early 2009.  Pro-labor regulatory changes are on the rise.  As […]
June 1, 2009
social_networking

The Curse of the Digital Age: Managing What Employees Say on the Internet

Call it the Curse of the Digital Age.  It’s the phenomenon known as social networking, and employers across the country are scrambling to get a handle […]
May 27, 2009
motivating_employees

Motivating Employees

Many workforces are still reeling from the job cuts that were a necessity and still are in this rough economy. Across all industries, those that survived […]
April 16, 2009
handshake

Employment status – A COMPARATIVE APPROACH (Employee vs. Independant Contractor)

Many employers believe substantial costs can be saved by utilizing independent contractors in lieu of employees. By hiring independent contractors the employer attempts to avoid costs […]